Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.- Read carefully all the Author guidelines; Must comply all JAHM Guidelines otherwise article will be rejected.
-
The blinded article file in MS word file format is prepared after careful reading of the author guidelines and declaring that all the guidelines are followed. The author and designation will be uploaded in a separate file as 1st page.
- In JAHM website while online submission, adding all author's complete names is mandatory. First name followed by Sur name in next square box. Also upload as separate word file while submitting. If author fails to do this, then 100rs extra will be added to the fees.
- References should be 100 % same as JAHM style ....including sequence of words and punctuations
-
For Case report and Case series article consent of the patient is mandatory.
Download the Patient consent form and case report article format by clicking the Download Tab in home page -
Download the copyright form, sign and upload as a supplementary file- by clicking the Download Tab in home page
https://jahm.co.in/index.php/jahm/Download - For Clinical Research IEC letter and for Invitro, and In Vivo research IAEC letter is mandatory
Original Research Article- Clinical Research
Upload IEC approval letter (For Pilot study not mandatory)
CTRI registration desirable (Mandatory for funded research)
Original Research Article- Experimental Research
AEC approval Must
CTRI registration desirable
Study Protocol
We accept study protocols for proposed or ongoing prospective clinical research, offering a detailed account of the study's hypothesis, rationale, methodology, and ethical considerations. Publishing your protocol with us ensures it becomes a fully citable, open-access article.
We review study protocol submissions individually and accept only those for studies that have not completed participant recruitment at the time of submission. We encourage authors to submit protocols well before participant recruitment is complete and to confirm the study status in the cover letter.
Please note, we do not accept study protocols for pilot or feasibility studies. Instead, authors are encouraged to submit pilot results as a research article and the protocol for the full study.
Scoping Review
Purpose and Scope
Scoping reviews aim to map the existing evidence on a particular topic, identify key concepts, gaps in research, and examine the types, sources, and distribution of evidence in the field. Unlike systematic reviews, scoping reviews do not seek to provide synthesized answers to specific clinical questions but instead offer a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of a research topic. This journal welcomes scoping reviews that contribute significantly to research domains by outlining the scope of existing literature, providing clarity, and setting a foundation for further, more focused research.
Methodological Requirements
-
Use of PRISMA-ScR: Authors are expected to follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist as a guiding structure. This checklist provides the recommended reporting items to ensure that scoping reviews are conducted and reported with transparency, rigor, and replicability.
-
Eligibility Criteria:
- Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Authors must clearly outline inclusion and exclusion criteria based on concepts, context, and population relevant to the topic. These criteria should be explicitly stated and justified within the Methods section.
- Data Sources and Search Strategy: Reviews must include a comprehensive search strategy, detailing electronic databases searched, keywords used, and any additional sources (e.g., grey literature). The search strategy should be rigorous and reproducible, covering relevant years and geographic scope.
-
Screening and Selection Process: Authors should report the process for screening and selection of studies, preferably using a two-reviewer system to minimize bias. Discrepancies between reviewers should be documented, and the method for resolving them should be specified.
-
Data Extraction and Charting:
- Authors should provide a clear and replicable data extraction method, specifying all data fields and variables collected. Extraction should include details on study design, population, interventions (if applicable), outcomes, and significant findings.
- Data charting should be systematic and include a summary of key concepts, methodologies, study designs, and outcomes relevant to the review question.
-
Synthesis of Results: Results should be presented descriptively, summarizing themes, trends, and gaps in the literature. Data synthesis should aim to provide an overview rather than a quantitative synthesis and should be organized around key domains identified during data extraction.
-
Quality Appraisal: While not always mandatory for scoping reviews, authors are encouraged to assess the methodological quality of included studies where relevant. This may involve assessing potential sources of bias or limitations within the body of evidence, particularly if it has implications for practice or policy.
Reporting and Presentation
-
Abstract: The abstract should provide a structured summary, covering background, objective, methods, main findings, and implications for future research.
-
Introduction: Clearly articulate the rationale, objectives, and research questions that the scoping review aims to address. Include background information on the topic and the significance of mapping current evidence.
-
Methods: Include all details of the scoping review approach, data sources, search terms, eligibility criteria, screening, and data extraction methods. Clearly state that the PRISMA-ScR guidelines were followed.
-
Results: Provide a descriptive account of findings, organized by themes or key categories identified. Use tables, charts, and figures as needed for clarity.
-
Discussion: Summarize findings, discuss the implications for practice and research, and highlight key gaps or limitations identified. Provide recommendations for future research and potential areas for systematic reviews.
-
Conclusion: Conclude with a summary of the scope and key insights of the review, emphasizing the contribution to the field.
Editorial and Peer Review Process
Scoping reviews undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure that they meet the journal's standards for quality, transparency, and relevance. Submissions will be evaluated on:
- Methodological rigor and adherence to PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
- Clarity, thoroughness, and transparency in reporting.
- Contribution to the field and relevance for future research or clinical practice.
Ethics and Transparency
Authors are encouraged to register their scoping review protocol in an appropriate registry (e.g., Open Science Framework, PROSPERO). This enhances transparency and minimizes potential biases.
Formatting
Tables and figures should be included to summarize and present data concisely. Appendices may be used for supplementary materials, such as the full search strategy or a PRISMA-ScR checklist.
This policy aims to ensure that all submitted scoping reviews adhere to high standards, providing clarity, thoroughness, and valuable contributions to the field through methodical evidence mapping and gap identification.
Copyright Notice
The authors will retain copyright of their work and grant the Journal of Ayurveda and Holistic Medicine (JAHM) the right of first publication. Simultaneously, the work will be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License., allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgment of the author and initial publication in JAHM.
While the entire contents of JAHM are protected under Indian and international copyrights, the journal permits free, irrevocable, worldwide access to and a license to copy, use, distribute, perform, and display the work publicly. This includes the right to make and distribute works on any online platform for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution of authorship and ownership of rights is maintained. Additionally, the journal permits the creation of small numbers of printed copies for personal non-commercial use under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.
If JAHM decides not to publish a submitted work, the authors will be notified.
The authors declare that they are the sole authors of the work, that all authors have contributed to and agree with the content and conclusions of the work, that the work is original, and does not infringe upon any copyright, proprietary, or personal rights of any third party. Furthermore, they confirm that no part of the work or any related work has been submitted to another journal.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.