Publication ethics and Malpractice Statement

Atreya Ayurveda Publications, as the publisher of the Journal of Ayurveda and Holistic Medicine (JAHM), upholds the highest standards of publication ethics and integrity. We are committed to ensuring that all published research adheres to rigorous ethical guidelines and practices. As guardians of the publishing process, we recognize and embrace our ethical responsibilities at every stage of the publication cycle.

These guidelines are in compliance with the COPE Principles of Transparency and Best Practice Guidelines and the COPE Code of Conduct (https://publicationethics.org/core-practices).

Our commitment to publication ethics encompasses several key principles:

  1. Integrity: We prioritize honesty, integrity, and transparency in all aspects of publishing. We expect authors, reviewers, and editors to uphold these principles throughout the research and publication process.
  2. Fairness: We ensure fair and unbiased treatment of all submitted manuscripts, regardless of the authors' background, affiliation, or status. Manuscripts are evaluated based on their scientific merit, originality, and relevance to the journal's scope.
  3. Confidentiality: We maintain strict confidentiality regarding all submitted manuscripts and associated correspondence. Confidential information is safeguarded throughout the peer review process and beyond.
  4. Authorship and Attribution: We require that all individuals who have made significant contributions to the research are listed as authors. Proper attribution of sources and contributions is essential, and any conflicts of interest or potential conflicts must be disclosed.
  5. Plagiarism and Publication Malpractices: We have a zero-tolerance policy towards plagiarism, fraudulent data, and other publication malpractices. Manuscripts found to contain unethical practices will be promptly rejected or retracted, and appropriate actions will be taken against authors, including notification of their institutions and funding agencies.
  6. Editorial Independence: We uphold the editorial independence of JAHM and ensure that editorial decisions are based solely on the scientific merit of the manuscripts, without interference from external influences. The editor will make the final decision regarding acceptance and publishing of the articles submitted. The decisions will be made after strict editorial and peer review of the article.
  7. Retractions: Retraction is considered due to errors, inaccuracies, plagiarism, duplication, fabrication or falsification of data, unethical research practices, or copyright infringement. Upon investigation, authors are notified and given an opportunity to respond. A retraction notice is then published, detailing reasons and explaining actions, and the retracted article is visibly marked. 
  8. Data Sharing: The journal may require that data sharing adhere to ethical guidelines, particularly regarding patient confidentiality, and that authors provide a data availability statement specifying how and where the data can be accessed. Adhering to these requirements enhances the credibility and impact of the published research.