Editorial policy
During the initial editorial review, if the article does not fit the scope of the journal and the methods followed are wrong, then it will be rejected.
During the initial editorial review, if the article is not prepared as per JAHM guidelines it will be sent back for resubmission.
If the article fits the JAHM scope, prepared per the JAHM guidelines, it will be sent for peer review.
Editors will do strict evaluation regarding the plagiarism. If found, then the article will be rejected based on plagiarism.
The executive editor will assess the reviewer's reports and make the decision on the submission. The final decision arrived after conversing with the peer reviewer and related editors.
The revised manuscript is assessed by the editor first if the revision is satisfactory, then he will send the acceptance decision to the Executive Editor for the final decision. If the revision is unsatisfactory, the article will be sent for 2nd round peer review.
Roles of Editors
- The Editor-in-Chief and Executive Editor oversees the editorial process, ensuring timely and fair reviews and the integrity of the journal.
- Managing Editors takes care of copy editing, Proof reading, subscriptions.
- Senior Editors and Associate Editors manage submissions in their respective areas of expertise.
- Asst. Editors does the marketing job, pramotion, advertisement etc.
- The Advisory Board consists of leading experts who contribute to shaping the journal’s strategic direction and policy development.
