Peer Review

All manuscripts contributed to JAHM at first blinded. Then, Editors will email selected Reviewers the title and abstract of the submission, as well as an invitation to log into the journal website to complete the review.  Most of the blinded articles are sent by email, and the reviewed article is also received by email. A three-day time period is given for the reviewers to accept the article for review. Reviewers are invited through email notification and, upon agreeing to do the review, are allowed to download blind manuscripts, submit their comments, and select a recommendation. For this process, peer reviewers will be given 10 days. The JAHM will publish a peer-reviewed manuscript within 4 weeks of receipt.

Guidelines for Reviewer 

All selected reviewers should adhere and follow the guidelines formed by JAHM editorial board. 

1. Reviewers must critically review the assigned paper in specified time frame of JAHM. 

2. Reviewers must follow the full double - blind international refereeing process to ensure the quality review. 

3. All the review feedbacks must be provided in written form through JAHM Review template. 

4. Reviewers must highlight the parts of submitted manuscripts that require amendments from authors. The expert reviewer suggestions will be value-added. 

5. If reviewers find any paper suitable for publishing even then critical remarks should be given in order to improve the quality of manuscripts. 

6. The paper will be reviewed by the same reviewer once the suggested changes are done in the reviewed paper. 

7. Reviewers must maintain the formatting and style of original manuscripts as strictly adhered by templates of JAHM. 

8. Editorial board of JAHM has every right to override any suggested changes by reviewers and their decision should not be ruled out by reviewer.