Manas Prakriti Assessment Inventory (MPAI): Development, Standardization, and Validation of an Ayurveda-Based Personality Measure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70066/jahm.v14i10.2903Keywords:
Manas Prakriti, Manas Prakriti Assessment Inventory, Mental Health, Personality Type, Psychology in Ayurveda, SattvaAbstract
Background: In Ayurvedic treatises, the state of a person’s psyche (Sattva) is shaped by the Triguna (three mental attributes: Sattva, Rajas and Tamas), whose relative predominance determines an individual’s mental constitution, known as Manas Prakriti. Although the Triguna concept has been examined by several psychologists, methodologically rigorous assessment tools developed within Ayurveda remain scarce. Objective: To develop the Manas Prakriti Assessment Inventory (MPAI) and to evaluate its reliability and validity using structured psychometric procedures. Material and Methods: Development comprised systematic item generation, preliminary draft construction, pilot testing, field testing and psychometric analysis. After approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee (Letter No. Dean/2016-17/EC/768), the MPAI was administered to 100 clinically healthy students aged 18-25 years from different departments of Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi; 95 complete responses were analyzed. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and Guttman’s lambda-2, content validity by a panel of 14 experts, and convergent validity and classification agreement against an existing Manas Prakriti questionnaire. Results: Internal consistency (n = 95) was satisfactory for the Sattvika (Sattva-predominant; Cronbach’s alpha = 0.806) and Rajasika (Rajas-predominant; 0.731) dimensions and acceptable for the Tamasika (Tamas-predominant) dimension (0.684; Guttman’s lambda-2 = 0.706). All 14 experts (9 Ayurveda, 5 psychology) rated the inventory applicable or strongly applicable. In the 71 participants whose Prakriti was classifiable by both instruments, all three MPAI dimensions correlated positively and significantly with the corresponding dimensions of the existing questionnaire (Sattvika r = 0.531, p < 0.001; Rajasika r = 0.356, p < 0.01; Tamasika r = 0.240, p < 0.05), and the two tools assigned the same Manas Prakriti to 76.06% of participants (Gwet’s first-order agreement coefficient [AC1] = 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–0.85). Conclusion: The MPAI shows satisfactory evidence of reliability and convergent validity for assessing mental constitution in healthy university students aged 18-25 years.
References
Yadavaji Trikamaji (editor). Charaka Samhita of Charaka, Sharirasthana, chapter 4, verse no.36-39. Reprint edition, Varanasi; Chowkhambha Sanskrit Sansthan;2015;323-324.
2. Sankapal S. Indigenization of psychology in India: connecting cultural perspectives. International Journal of Indian Psychology. 2023 Nov;11(4):1219-1225. Available from: https://ijip.in/articles/indigenization-of-psychology/
3. Singh K, Jain A, Kaur J, Junnarkar M, Slezackova A. Cross-cultural differences on Gunas and other well-being dimensions. Asian J Psychiatr. 2016;24:139-146. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2016.09.001
4. Srivastava K. Concept of personality: Indian perspective. Ind Psychiatry J. 2012;21(2):89-93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.119586
5. Das RC. Standardization of the Gita Inventory of Personality. Journal of Indian Psychology. 1991;9(1-2):47-54. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1993-04001-001
6. Shilpa S, Venkatesha Murthy CG. Development and standardization of Mysore Tridosha scale. Ayu. 2011;32(3):308-314. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8520.93905
7. Kumar AA, Manjunath S, Jainer A. Manasa prakrti inventory: a pilot survey study-based tool to evaluate personality. Ayu. 2016;37(3-4):215-21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/ayu.AYU_83_16
8. Ravi KV, Chiplunkar S, Shetty S. A pilot study on design and validation of Manasika Prakriti questionnaire. Journal of Ayurveda and Holistic Medicine (JAHM). 2013;1(2):15-25. Available from: https://jahm.co.in/index.php/jahm/article/view/424/403
9. Kewal Krishan Thakral (editor). Sushruta Samhita of Sushruta, Sharirasthana, chapter 4, verse no.80-97. 1st edition, Varanasi; Chaukhambha Orientalia;2014;70-73.
10. Premvati Tewari (editor). Kashyapa Samhita of Vriddhajeevaka, Sutrasthana, chapter 28, verse no.11-14. Reprint edition, Varanasi; Chaukhambha Visvabharati;2013;81-82.
11. Shivprasad Sharma (editor). Ashtanga Sangraha of Vrddha Vagbhata, Sharirasthana, chapter 8, verse no.17. 4th edition, Varanasi; Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office;2016;329.
12. Yadavaji Trikamaji (editor). Commentary: Ayurveda Deepika of Chakrapani on Charaka Samhita of Charaka, Sharirasthana, chapter 4, verse no.37, Reprint edition, Varanasi; Chowkhambha Sanskrit Sansthan;2015;323.
13. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):651-657. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1
14. Pusch S, Mund M, Hagemeyer B, Finn C. Personality development in emerging and young adulthood: a study of age differences. European Journal of Personality. 2019;33(3):245-263. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2181
15. Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000;55(5):469-480. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10842426/
16. Del Giudice M. Emerging adulthood, a pre-adult life-history stage. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;10:918. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00918
17. Hystad SW, Johnsen BH. The dimensionality of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): comparisons of factor structures and invariance across samples and time. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1300. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01300
18. Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543-549. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-L
19. Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(5):423-429. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-V
20. Gwet KL. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2008;61(1):29-48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1348/000711006X126600
21. Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Wedding D, Gwet KL. A comparison of Cohen’s kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:61. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-61
22. Cicchetti DV, Feinstein AR. High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):551-558. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-M
23. Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85(3):257-268. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/85.3.257
24. Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ. 1997;314(7080):572. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572
25. Sijtsma K. On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika. 2009;74(1):107-120. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
26. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
27. Yadavaji Trikamaji (editor). Charaka Samhita of Charaka, Sutrasthana, chapter 1, verse no.57. Reprint edition, Varanasi; Chowkhambha Sanskrit Sansthan;2015;16.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr Anam Aftab, Dr Girish Singh, Prof. Shobhna Joshi, Prof. Sangeeta Gehlot
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal of Ayurveda and Holistic Medicine (JAHM) the right of first publication. All published articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license, which permits non-commercial sharing, use, distribution, and adaptation with proper attribution and the same license terms.
JAHM ensures free, irrevocable, worldwide access to its content. Users may copy, distribute, display, and share published works for non-commercial purposes with appropriate credit to the author(s) and the journal. Limited printed copies for personal, non-commercial use are allowed under the same license.
If a submission is not accepted for publication, the author(s) will be notified.
By submitting, authors confirm that the work is original, that all listed authors have contributed and approved it, and that it does not infringe any third-party rights or duplicate work submitted elsewhere.
