Critical Analysis of MS Arogyalavana in Comparison with Rasendra Chudamani

Authors

  • Kiran Kumari Parul Institute of Ayurveda & Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
  • Amit Upasani Parul Institute of Ayurveda & Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70066/jahm.v13i5.1814

Keywords:

Manuscript, Kshara, Lavana, Arogya, Ayurved

Abstract

Background: The art of writing emerged as a way of preserving knowledge that was previously transmitted orally from one generation to the next though recording thoughts and ideas, it became possible to transmit knowledge not only to the future generations but also distant land. Manuscript, which means 'written by hand', is a recording of information created by someone at some time. Sanskrit was the most popular medium of instruction for a long time. The primary aim of the manuscripts was to preserve knowledge. Arogyalavana is untouched MSS (Manuscripts) present in oriental institute of Baroda, it is a single folded sheet with 2 folios. Aim & objectives: To study MS (Manuscript) Arogyalavana & Compare the formulations in MS with formulations in Rasendra chudamani (Ras.ch). Methodology- Unpublished MS Arogyalavana is collected from Oriental Institute Baroda. Formulations in the MS compared with Rasendra chudamani (Ras.ch). Observation: In this Manuscript Two Kalpas are given out of which first one is Arogyalavana & other 4 Kaplas are Kshar Kaplana. In this contents, Preparatory method, Anupana & Indications are given. Conclusion: This MS Arogyalavana includes Preparatory method, Anupana and uses. It is a collection of more Kalpas with preparatory methods, indications. Formulations like Arogyalavana and other should be further studied and clinically explored to see its efficiency. MS like this are treasure house of knowledge and should be explored for further studies.

Author Biographies

Kiran Kumari, Parul Institute of Ayurveda & Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

MD 2nd yr Scholar, Ayurved Samhita & Siddhanta, Parul Institute of Ayurveda & Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Amit Upasani, Parul Institute of Ayurveda & Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Prof. & HOD, Ayurved Samhita & Siddhanta, Parul Institute of Ayurveda & Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

References

Anand G. Handbook of Medical Manuscriptology. 1st ed. Bangalore: Institute of Ayurveda & Integrative Medicine (I-AIM), Foundation for Revitalization of Local Health Traditions (FRLHT); 2010; 1: 03

Anand G. Handbook of Medical Manuscriptology. 1st ed. Bangalore: Institute of Ayurveda & Integrative Medicine (IAIM), Foundation for Revitalization of Local Health Traditions (FRLHT); 2010; 2:10-11

Somadeva A. Rasendra Chudamani, chapter 9, verse no. 4-5. 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Orientalia; 2017: 125-126

Bhave S, Joshi M. A critical study of manuscript ‘Pramehadhikar’. NJ-RAS [Internet]. 2022 Jan 4 [cited 2025 Jun 10];10(1). Available from: https://ayurlog.com/index.php/ayurlog/article/view/946

Monier-Williams M. A Sanskrit-English Dictionary. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass; 2005: 1587

Lochan K, Byadgi PS. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Ayurveda. 1st ed. New Delhi: Chaukhambha Publications; 2011:930

Dixit SO, Angadi R, Vatsalya DG. An appraisal of Kshara Kalpana. J Ayurveda Integr Med Sci. 2017;2(5):160–167. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21760/jaims.v2i05.324

Additional Files

Published

2025-06-19

How to Cite

Kumari, K. ., & Upasani, A. . (2025). Critical Analysis of MS Arogyalavana in Comparison with Rasendra Chudamani. Journal of Ayurveda and Holistic Medicine (JAHM), 13(5), 110-116. https://doi.org/10.70066/jahm.v13i5.1814